<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Insight Turkey / author</title>
	<description>author | Insight Turkey</description>
	<link>https://www.insightturkey.com/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.insightturkey.com/services/rss/author/ali-balci" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<category>author</category>
	<language>EN</language>
<item><title>The Alliance of Civilizations: The Poverty of the Clash/Alliance Dichotomy? - Ali Balcı</title><category>author</category><description>The Alliance of Civilizations (AoC) initiative emerged from debates around the “clash of civilizations.” Based on this I will argue that the “alliance” notion is an integral part of the clash of civilizations thesis. Thereby, clash and alliance together form a mutually constituting “dichotomy,” which I will call “the clash/alliance dichotomy.” In the first part of the article, I will give a brief summary of the emergence and expansion of the “clash of civilizations” myth. The second part seeks to underline important attempts to “de-mythize” the clash of civilizations thesis. Later, I will show how the “dialogue” notion emerged as a response to the clash-based ideas and how it became a complementary part of “the clash/alliance dichotomy”. In the last part, I will focus on the problems of the AoC that stems from the fact that it emerged as a “reactionary entity.”</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/author/ali-balci/the-alliance-of-civilizations-the-poverty-of-the-clashalliance-dichotomy</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/author/ali-balci/the-alliance-of-civilizations-the-poverty-of-the-clashalliance-dichotomy</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:10:57 GMT</pubDate></item></channel>
</rss>
