<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Insight Turkey / issues</title>
	<description>issues | Insight Turkey</description>
	<link>https://www.insightturkey.com/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.insightturkey.com/services/rss/issues/the-making-of-a-new-middle-east" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<category>issues</category>
	<language>EN</language>
<item><title>Editor's Note | Summer 2011</title><category>Editor's Note</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2018/01/29/summer20111.jpg" title="Editor's Note | Summer 2011" alt="Editor's Note | Summer 2011" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;There is no better instrument than the ballot box to decide “who is to govern” if we care about popular legitimacy. No one can question the mandate given by the people through a free and fair election to a political party, irrespective of its ideology, identity and program.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/editors-note/editors-note-summer-2011</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/editors-note/editors-note-summer-2011</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:01:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Unrest in the Arab World: Four Questions</title><category>Commentaries</category><description>This essay addresses four questions that the “Arab spring” has raised with respect to academic scholarship and policy advice. Why did scholars fail to predict the recent developments? Should we throw the work on Middle Eastern authoritarianism in the garbage bin of academic misinterpretations? In which ways can we support the move toward democracy in the region? Is there a “new Middle East” in the making? In critically examining the scholarly debate about the resilience of Arab authoritarianism, it rejects demands requesting both the predictive power of academic analyses and their direct applicability in foreign policy-making. The continuing interpretation and re-interpretation of the relationship between Islam and politics have absorbed our analytical capacities at the expense of a closer inspection of societal change. In putting the recent events into their international and regional context, the essay tries to give a tentative answer to the question whether we are witnessing a new Middle East in the making.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/commentary/unrest-in-the-arab-world-four-questions</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/commentary/unrest-in-the-arab-world-four-questions</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:15:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Russia’s Counter-Revolutionary Stance toward the Arab Spring</title><category>Commentaries</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/19/20110509153632-rus199-15731651.jpg" title="Russia’s Counter-Revolutionary Stance toward the Arab Spring" alt="Russia’s Counter-Revolutionary Stance toward the Arab Spring" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;The wave of uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa has not only affected Russia’s interests but also opens some new opportunities for strengthening Russian influence. Nevertheless, the prevalent attitude in Moscow towards these dissimilar but inter-connected crises is negative, which is caused primarily by the nature of its own corrupt quasi-democratic regime haunted by the specter of revolution. The stalled NATO intervention in Libya has re-focused the attention of the Russian leadership on the issue of sovereignty, which determines the decision to disallow any UN sanctions against Syria. Russia’s position has evolved in synch with the course taken by China, and Moscow is interested in strengthening this counter-revolutionary proto-alliance by building up ties with conservative Arab regimes, including Saudi Arabia, and also by upgrading its strategic partnership with Turkey. Harvesting unexpected dividends from the turmoil in the Arab world,Russia cannot ignore the risks of a sudden explosion of a revolutionary energy – and neither can it effectively hedge against such a risk.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/commentary/russias-counter-revolutionary-stance-toward-the-arab-spring</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/commentary/russias-counter-revolutionary-stance-toward-the-arab-spring</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:28:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Prospects for Palestinian Unity After the Arab Spring</title><category>Commentaries</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/19/20110504160121-msr264-15695941.jpg" title="Prospects for Palestinian Unity After the Arab Spring" alt="Prospects for Palestinian Unity After the Arab Spring" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;If the revolutions sweeping then Arab world are in fact its “spring” then the Hamas/Fateh reconciliation deal may very well be the first buds this season produced. Whether or not this reconciliation deal will bear any fruit for the Palestinian people, however, is yet to be seen. To best understand the factors affecting the success of the deal, one must have grasp of the history of the relationship between Hamas and Fatah and the role of external actors in that relationship as well. In this commentary I lay out a history of tensions and the role of the US and Israel in driving wedges between the parties. Similar challenges will undoubtedly face this reconciliation attempt and the greatest chances of success can be achieved when both parties put the interests of the Palestinian people ahead of the demands of their external patrons.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/commentary/prospects-for-palestinian-unity-after-the-arab-spring</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/commentary/prospects-for-palestinian-unity-after-the-arab-spring</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:43:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Turkish Foreign Policy in the Balkans and “Neo-Ottomanism”: A Personal Account</title><category>Commentaries</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/19/1358818-somun1.jpg" title="Turkish Foreign Policy in the Balkans and “Neo-Ottomanism”: A Personal Account" alt="Turkish Foreign Policy in the Balkans and “Neo-Ottomanism”: A Personal Account" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;This essay examines the influence and performance as well as the perception of the new, pro-active Turkish foreign policy in South-East Europe. It emphasizes that certain political and intellectual circles in the Balkans have a different take on Turkey’s policies in the region. The paper assesses how Turkey’s activism in the Balkans has revived the debate on the Ottoman legacy in the region and Turkey’s perceived aspirations to renew its influence under the guise of “neo-Ottomanism.” This paper will also address the impact in this debate caused by the recent book of the well-known Serbian orientalist, Darko Tanaskovic, entitled “Neo-Ottomanism – the Return of Turkey to the Balkans.”</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/commentary/turkish-foreign-policy-in-the-balkans-and-neo-ottomanism-a-personal-account</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/commentary/turkish-foreign-policy-in-the-balkans-and-neo-ottomanism-a-personal-account</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:56:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Turkey’s 2011 General Elections: Towards a Dominant Party System?</title><category>Articles</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/21/20110609152345-siv162-15969801.jpg" title="Turkey’s 2011 General Elections: Towards a Dominant Party System?" alt="Turkey’s 2011 General Elections: Towards a Dominant Party System?" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;Since 2002, the Turkish electoral environment and the party system have been undergoing a significant transformation. The Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) has continued to increase its electoral support for a third time in a row. The declining volatility and fractionalization in the election results together with the expanding geographical base of AKP electoral support may be taken as signs of the emergence of a dominant party system in Turkey. This article offers a descriptive account of the election results and links those results to the literature on the dominant party system. A discussion on the implications of this new development for the evolution of Turkish party system, Turkish political landscape and future elections concludes the article.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/turkeys-2011-general-elections-towards-a-dominant-party-system</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/turkeys-2011-general-elections-towards-a-dominant-party-system</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:36:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Economic Liberalization and Class Dynamics in Turkey: New Business Groups and Islamic Mobilization</title><category>Articles</category><description>The growth of new capitalist classes since the 1980s has transformed social stratification, multi-party politics and the international political orientation of Turkey. New business groups energized by Islam have facilitated much-needed class mobility. In this process, there has also emerged a confrontational split in middle-class positions between Islamic and secular political outlooks. These new middle classes are engaged in promoting Islam as a strategic resource in the class politics of Turkey and seek protection from the negative effects of market capitalism. More dramatically, these new capitalist classes have redefined the allocation of markets and the distribution of assets while they have increased opportunities for their affiliated groups at home and in foreign markets. However, the paradox between modernity and authenticity remains unresolved for Turkey’s old middle classes and the new pious elite alike. Although the Islamic-leaning business groups have become the winners of the new regime, they have increasingly lost their cutting-edge idealism and originality and are being “normalized” as the new establishment.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/economic-liberalization-and-class-dynamics-in-turkey-new-business-groups-and-islamic-mobilization</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/economic-liberalization-and-class-dynamics-in-turkey-new-business-groups-and-islamic-mobilization</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:14:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Syrian Opposition in the Making: Capabilities and Limits</title><category>Articles</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/21/20110329161844-sry261-15457981.jpg" title="The Syrian Opposition in the Making: Capabilities and Limits" alt="The Syrian Opposition in the Making: Capabilities and Limits" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;Syria became the latest Middle Eastern country to join the chain of protests sweeping across the Middle East. The protests have since spread to several other cities with varying frequency and numbers, and the violent handling of the protests by the Syrian regime has created a protest movement, which has brought forth an array of demands from political reform to the fall of the regime. Opposition in different forms has always existed in Syria and among the Syrian diaspora. However, legal restrictions on social and political activities and the long-lasting atmosphere of fear, perpetrated by the Ba’ath Party and pervasive intelligence services, have so far limited the opposition’s organizational capabilities. Despite difficulties and restrictions, the Syrian opposition is in the making. This paper presents a brief analysis of the opposition in Syria, surveys the opposition’s fight for survival under the Ba’ath regime, and assesses its current strength and weaknesses.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/the-syrian-opposition-in-the-making-capabilities-and-limits</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/the-syrian-opposition-in-the-making-capabilities-and-limits</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:44:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The EU and the Arab Spring: Between Spectatorship and Actorness</title><category>Articles</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/21/20110512100843-lby009-15752961.jpg" title="The EU and the Arab Spring: Between Spectatorship and Actorness" alt="The EU and the Arab Spring: Between Spectatorship and Actorness" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;Throughout the first seven months of the Arab Spring, starting with the self-immolation of Mohammed Bouazizi in the Tunisian town of Sidi Bouzid on December 17, 2010, the EU clearly revealed itself as both an actor and spectator by resorting to both activism and passivism in a seemingly erratic fashion. Against this background and based on the EU’s recently adopted Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean, this article aims at understanding this dualism more precisely and shedding some light on the EU’s rather anachronistic foreign policy behavior in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) in recent months. The article identifies five dichotomies, all of which contribute to the situation in which the EU continues to be torn between being a relevant political actor in the MENA region and a simple spectator that continues to be overwhelmed by local and regional political developments.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/the-eu-and-the-arab-spring-between-spectatorship-and-actorness</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/the-eu-and-the-arab-spring-between-spectatorship-and-actorness</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:06:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>The New Middle East and the United States: What to Expect After the Uprisings?</title><category>Articles</category><description>Recent uprisings and unrests across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) have brought new leadership to Egypt and Tunisia, and could possibly result in more leadership changes.  While it is too early to assess the meaning and implications of the MENA uprisings, it is even more difficult to predict whether the current ferment could fundamentally reshape the region by bringing real democratic transformation. What is evident, however, is that the United States’ old bargain with autocrats is collapsing; and that U.S. strategic interests are seemingly better served, at least during this historic period, by working with governments that genuinely reflect the will of their people. This essay’s central argument is that change and transformation in MENA has resulted from bottom-up, anti-establishment popular movements that have exposed the flaws of the U.S. foreign policy and will most likely challenge the conventional U.S. policies in the region for years to come.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/the-new-middle-east-and-the-united-states-what-to-expect-after-the-uprisings</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/the-new-middle-east-and-the-united-states-what-to-expect-after-the-uprisings</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:22:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Turkey’s New Activism in the Western Balkans: Ambitions and Obstacles</title><category>Articles</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/21/20100424150045-ist248-13188871.jpg" title="Turkey’s New Activism in the Western Balkans: Ambitions and Obstacles" alt="Turkey’s New Activism in the Western Balkans: Ambitions and Obstacles" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;Following the Turkish Chairmanship-in-Office of the South-East European Cooperation Process (SEECP), 2009 represented the year of Turkey’s return to the Western Balkans as an influential actor. Granted, Turkey’s Balkan policy became a matter of contention. Ankara’s Bosnia and Herzegovina initiative even raised questions as to whether Turkey is aspiring to restore its former power and influence over the region. Those expressing their unease over this initiative are accusing Turkey of nurturing inclinations reminiscent of the Ottoman state. To counter this image, Turkish officials are using every opportunity to underline that Ankara has no intentions other than to contribute to the consolidation of peace and stability in the Western Balkans. This article reviews the last two years of Turkish policy towards the region, and includes evaluations on the perception of Turkey’s proactive Western Balkans policy.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/turkeys-new-activism-in-the-western-balkans-ambitions-and-obstacles</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/turkeys-new-activism-in-the-western-balkans-ambitions-and-obstacles</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:37:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Turkish Interests and Involvement in the Western Balkans: A Score-Card</title><category>Articles</category><description>The vigor which has characterized the Turkish approach to the Western Balkans since the end of the Cold War has transformed the country into an important regional actor from its previous position as a distant neighbor that showed little interest. Although Turkey and the Western Balkan countries have in the meanwhile achieved the most intensive relationship since the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire, Turkey has not yet displayed the economic capacity and political weight that could make it compete with the magnetism of the European Union for Western Balkan countries. Turkish cultural influence, although significantly widened in the last few years, particularly through investments in educational institutions, is mostly limited to the Muslim population in the region. While potential EU membership remains the most important driver for the political elites in the region, the stalled EU membership prospects of both Turkey and the countries of the region might change this in the future.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/turkish-interests-and-involvement-in-the-western-balkans-a-score-card</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/turkish-interests-and-involvement-in-the-western-balkans-a-score-card</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:52:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Turkey in Europe: Record, Challenges and the Future</title><category>Articles</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/21/20110415120258-alm079-15553761.jpg" title="Turkey in Europe: Record, Challenges and the Future" alt="Turkey in Europe: Record, Challenges and the Future" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;The relationship between Turkey (and its predecessor, the Ottoman Empire) and Europe has been long, often tense or openly hostile, and is in some senses fundamental to the identities and development of each; this relationship also adds a considerable burden of suspicion to Turkey’s current aim of joining the European Union (EU). This essay examines these propositions by providing an account of the history of the relationship and of Europe’s recent, conditional approach to Turkish accession to the EU. While accepting that much remains to be done at the institutional level to bring Turkey into alignment with EU norms, this paper argues that Turkish accession is a historic opportunity for Europe that it should not squander. Despite mixed signals, further development of Turkey’s democracy along the path to Europe is the most likely course. The story is not “never-ending”, but the end will not come quickly.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/turkey-in-europe-record-challenges-and-the-future</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/turkey-in-europe-record-challenges-and-the-future</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:02:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Emergence of a “Big Brother” in Europe: Border Control and Securitization of Migration</title><category>Articles</category><description>The European Union (EU) has been devising new methods to manage irregular migration and border control. In the last few decades, a clear link has been established between migration, borders and security in Europe. The paper critically examines this link and the EU’s response to the problem through the implementation of two methods: the externalization of border control and increased surveillance. Both these instrument mainly aim at eradicating risk with the help of surveillance tools such as databases and profiling people travelling from third countries, preventing irregular migrants from reaching the EU through pre-emptive measures, and dealing with them outside of the Union as much as possible. However, these methods create other forms of insecurities while claiming to attain a more secure Europe, such as empowering states at the expense of individual liberties and making individuals part of a total surveillance system where their daily actions and preferences are recorded.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/emergence-of-a-big-brother-in-europe-border-control-and-securitization-of-migration</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/article/emergence-of-a-big-brother-in-europe-border-control-and-securitization-of-migration</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:17:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference</title><category>Book Reviews</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/18/woman.jpg" title="Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference" alt="Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;Professor Zilfi, a well-established, leading historian of the Ottoman Empire, has joined the small but constantly growing group of scholars interested in the study of Ottoman enslavement. Her current book is a most welcome addition to the second wave of studies devoted to the complex history of the practice, which is one of the most diverse and multi-faceted phenomena in the annals of human societies. While Zilfi clearly contributes to the discourse about the topic, she—refreshingly—does not pretend to reinvent the wheel, but rather treats the works of her predecessors with respect, fully engaging with their studies and demonstrating remarkable understanding of the intricacies they sought to explain in an area that had been uncharted territory.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/women-and-slavery-in-the-late-ottoman-empire-the-design-of-difference</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/women-and-slavery-in-the-late-ottoman-empire-the-design-of-difference</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:58:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>A Moveable Empire: Ottoman Nomads, Migrants and Refugees</title><category>Book Reviews</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/18/a-moveable.jpg" title="A Moveable Empire: Ottoman Nomads, Migrants and Refugees" alt="A Moveable Empire: Ottoman Nomads, Migrants and Refugees" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;Reşat Kasaba is a well-established, highly competent social scientist with a profound interest in the study of socioeconomic processes of change experienced in the Ottoman Empire. In this book that addresses the growing interest in migration as a social, and thus historical force, Kasaba offers his readers an excellent introductory study to human movement in the context of six hundred years of Ottoman rule. This book, in the end, is a valuable, but limited in its scope, textbook covering the Ottoman Empire that can be used in the undergraduate classroom rather than a graduate seminar.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/a-moveable-empire-ottoman-nomads-migrants-and-refugees</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/a-moveable-empire-ottoman-nomads-migrants-and-refugees</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:03:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Cinema in Turkey: A New Critical History</title><category>Book Reviews</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/18/cinema.jpg" title="Cinema in Turkey: A New Critical History" alt="Cinema in Turkey: A New Critical History" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;Cinema in Turkey differs from other recent books on the subject – notably Gönül Dönmez-Colin’s Turkish Cinema: Identity, Distance and Belonging (2008), and Asuman Suner’s New Turkish Cinema (2009) – in that Arslan focuses less on recent cinema in Turkey and more on the Yeşilçam era from the early 1950s to the late 1980s. More importantly, Arslan does not consider the cinema in Turkey either as ‘Turkish,’ or as expressive of a certain construction of national identity.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/cinema-in-turkey-a-new-critical-history</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/cinema-in-turkey-a-new-critical-history</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:06:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Headscarf Politics in Turkey, A Postcolonial Reading</title><category>Book Reviews</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/18/heads.jpg" title="Headscarf Politics in Turkey, A Postcolonial Reading" alt="Headscarf Politics in Turkey, A Postcolonial Reading" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;The distressing photo on the cover effectively represents the content of this book. The photo depicts a junior high school student amidst male and female police officers who tear up her headscarf at the entrance of a school in 2001. We do not see the girl’s face, but we can imagine her shame and fury for the act and the injustice of the ban.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/headscarf-politics-in-turkey-a-postcolonial-reading</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/headscarf-politics-in-turkey-a-postcolonial-reading</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:09:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Turkey in the 1960’s and 1970’s Through the Reports of American Diplomats</title><category>Book Reviews</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/18/turkey-in.jpg" title="Turkey in the 1960’s and 1970’s Through the Reports of American Diplomats" alt="Turkey in the 1960’s and 1970’s Through the Reports of American Diplomats" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;Rıfat N. Bali has done us a great service by publishing reports of American diplomats about Turkey in the 1960’s and 1970’s. The book consists of 35 reports and cables prepared by American consulates in Istanbul, Adana Izmir, and the American Embassy in Ankara. Bali has organized the classified reports into five categories: the “political and social situation in Turkey,” “the situation after the May 27, 1960 Coup,” “the Turkish general staffs ultimatum of March 12, 1971,” “the Kurdish issue” and finally reports concerning minorities.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/turkey-in-the-1960s-and-1970s-through-the-reports-of-american-diplomats</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/turkey-in-the-1960s-and-1970s-through-the-reports-of-american-diplomats</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Turkey’s Entente with Israel and Azerbaijan: State Identity and Security in the Middle East and Caucasus</title><category>Book Reviews</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/18/turkeys-entente.jpg" title="Turkey’s Entente with Israel and Azerbaijan: State Identity and Security in the Middle East and Caucasus" alt="Turkey’s Entente with Israel and Azerbaijan: State Identity and Security in the Middle East and Caucasus" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;In this timely book Alexander Murinson explores the forces behind the entente between Turkey, Israel, and Azerbaijan. He juxtaposes these three countries, which he characterizes as “garrison-, like-minded, ‘Westernistic’, secular, constitutionally nationalist and lonely states.” (p.143) Those features depict the identity construct of the three states, which on the face of it, may seem to have conflicting interests in the turbulent Eurasian region spanning the Caucasus, Central Asia, the Middle East and the Balkans. Each of the three states is a sui generis actor on the global stage – post-imperial, western-oriented Turkey with global ambitions ruled by a post-Islamist party, a Jewish state encircled by Arab neighbors, and an oil-rich post-soviet republic with an autocratic regime.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/turkeys-entente-with-israel-and-azerbaijan-state-identity-and-security-in-the-middle-east-and-caucasus</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/turkeys-entente-with-israel-and-azerbaijan-state-identity-and-security-in-the-middle-east-and-caucasus</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:16:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Shoah: Turkey, the US, and the UK</title><category>Book Reviews</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/18/shoah.jpg" title="Shoah: Turkey, the US, and the UK" alt="Shoah: Turkey, the US, and the UK" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;T“I was alive only because I had a Turkish passport,” tells Lazar Russo in Arnold Reisman’s Shoah: Turkey, the US and the UK. Lazar Russo was living in France when the Nazis occupied it. As with the other Jews, it was impossible for him to leave the country. However, remaining meant certain extermination. Only after the Turkish Consulate in Paris offered him a passport could he escape. He went to Turkey. It was an unusual move from a foreign country those days.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/shoah-turkey-the-us-and-the-uk</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/shoah-turkey-the-us-and-the-uk</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:19:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Syria and the Doctrine of Arab Neutralism: from Independence to Dependence</title><category>Book Reviews</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/18/syria.jpg" title="Syria and the Doctrine of Arab Neutralism: from Independence to Dependence" alt="Syria and the Doctrine of Arab Neutralism: from Independence to Dependence" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;Rami Ginat’s monograph traces the development of Syria’s foreign policy of neutralism during its early years of independence in until the fall of the Soviet Union. By situating the evolution of Syrian politics within a global framework that incorporates the diplomatic positions of emerging nations of the so-called Third World– particularly India, Egypt, Yugoslavia, and Indonesia – Ginat demonstrates the multifaceted face of neutralism that simultaneously united and divided nations seeking an alternative “third path” within the ideological struggle of the Cold War.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/syria-and-the-doctrine-of-arab-neutralism-from-independence-to-dependence</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/syria-and-the-doctrine-of-arab-neutralism-from-independence-to-dependence</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:23:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Questioning the Veil: Open Letters to Muslim Women</title><category>Book Reviews</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/18/quest.jpg" title="Questioning the Veil: Open Letters to Muslim Women" alt="Questioning the Veil: Open Letters to Muslim Women" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;Leaving aside the academic discourse, the “theoretical and methodological shields that usually ensure a semblance of detachment,” (p.ix) Marnia Lazreg, a professor of sociology at Hunter College and the City University of New York Graduate Center, adds her voice to the ever-expanding bibliography on the veil.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/questioning-the-veil-open-letters-to-muslim-women</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/questioning-the-veil-open-letters-to-muslim-women</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:27:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>he Roots of Balkanization: Eastern Europe C.E. 500-1500</title><category>Book Reviews</category><description>&lt;img src="https://www.insightturkey.com/images/news/2017/12/18/the-roots.jpg" title="he Roots of Balkanization: Eastern Europe C.E. 500-1500" alt="he Roots of Balkanization: Eastern Europe C.E. 500-1500" width="88" height="66" align="left" hspace="3" vspace="3"&gt;In his book, Ion Grumeza ambitiously sets about “to fill a gap with authoritative material on how the process of Balkanization came about, to separate fact from fiction and trace the patterns of ethnic and cultural life that originated fifteen centuries ago.” (p. ix) Furthermore, the book “traces the creation of the present Balkan nations and examines their influence on Eastern Europe.” (p.xiii) With this impressive aim in mind, the author has studied some hundred historical books on the Balkans, or at least this is what we find in his bibliography.</description><link>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/in-his-book-ion-grumeza-ambitiously-sets-about-to-fill-a-gap-with-authoritative-material-on-how-the-process-of-balkanization-came-about-to-separate-fact-from-fiction-and-trace-the-patterns-of-ethnic-and-cultural-life-that-originated-fifteen-centuries-ago-</link><guid>https://www.insightturkey.com/book-reviews/in-his-book-ion-grumeza-ambitiously-sets-about-to-fill-a-gap-with-authoritative-material-on-how-the-process-of-balkanization-came-about-to-separate-fact-from-fiction-and-trace-the-patterns-of-ethnic-and-cultural-life-that-originated-fifteen-centuries-ago-</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:31:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel>
</rss>
