Insight Turkey
Insight Turkey
Challenging ideas
On Turkish politics and International affairs

Insight Turkey > Articles |

Rethinking Peacebuilding in Afghanistan: A Post-Structuralist Approach

This paper examines the “liberal peace” paradigm and its associated peacebuilding methodological approach, identifying significant roadblocks arising from its epistemological and ontological foundations and institutional hegemony. The failures of the “liberal peace project” in conflict-affected societies have raised doubts about its validity and reliability as a transformative approach. Despite claims of compatibility with local cultural, social, and religious sensitivities, the implementation of top-down theoretical frameworks has often lacked genuine emancipation, yielding disparate outcomes. Surprisingly, there has been limited effort to deconstruct the entire “liberal peace” paradigm. This paper does not propose alternative peacebuilding approaches; instead, it aims to stimulate critical reflections to foster the emergence of alternative discourses. Focusing on Afghanistan as a case study, the analysis employs post-structuralism to deconstruct the theoretical underpinnings of the “liberal peace” order and to examine the U.S. peacebuilding framework in Afghanistan. By doing so, it reveals the intricacies of the “liberal peace” approach and identifies potential areas for improvement and reformulation.

Rethinking Peacebuilding in Afghanistan A Post-Structuralist Approach
 

 

 

 

Introduction

 

The liberal philosophical approach re-identified and altered the structure of the world order after the end of the Cold War. The post-Cold War period witnessed the rise and advancement of liberal democracy in conflict-ridden societies and gained phenomenal salience. Various scholars1 support the claims while referring to Immanuel Kant’s ideas in “perpetual peace,” which implies that liberal democratic states are more peaceful and less prone to violence. This normative utility is supported by liberal internationalists2 who believed in the universality of liberalism, and neo-liberal global order and institution building thereupon.3 It was further iterated that some central tenets are compulsory and fundamental for exporting the currency of liberalism.4 The pronouncement of liberalism as the principal approach to peacebuilding was envisaged in neo-liberal macro-economic strategies that were mapped out in the processes of democratization, market reforms, human rights, and peace settlements.5 Originally, it was believed that the expansion of Western liberal ideas into conflict-stricken and dysfunctional societies would resolve a wide range of economic, political, and social problems. However, the resultant scenarios have revealed the discordance of liberal internationalism or liberal intervention in societies such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria.

Already have an account? Sign In.
Print Subscription
4 Print Issues
Subscribe
Digital Subscription
4 Digital Issues
Subscribe
Premium Subscription
4 Print Issues
4 Digital Issues
Subscribe

Labels »  

We use cookies in a limited and restricted manner for specific purposes. For more details, you can see "our data policy". More...