Insight Turkey
Insight Turkey
Challenging ideas
On Turkish politics and International affairs

Insight Turkey > Articles |

The Republican People’s Party’s Approach to the Kurdish Question: A Comparison of Deniz Baykal and Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu Periods

This study focuses on the Kurdish question that has occupied the political and social agenda of Türkiye for a long time. It also closely examines the Republican People’s Party’s (CHP) approach to the issue. This study analyzes and compares the approaches of two former chairmen of the CHP, the late Deniz Baykal and Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, to the Kurdish question. The study focuses on the approaches of the two leaders to nationalism, ethnic identity, and identity politics while it tries to capture the continuity and change in the CHP’s attitude toward the Kurdish question. The study uses comparison and discourse analysis methods and concentrates on party programs, election manifestos, and the leader’s speeches. The concern of protecting the regime seemed to determine the CHP’s approach to the Kurdish question during the Baykal period, but the socio-economic problems of the Kurds defined the party’s approach as it partially moved away from nationalist policies in the Kılıçdaroğlu period.

The Republican People s Party s Approach to the Kurdish
CHP
 

 

 

 

Introduction

 

The Kurdish question is one of the issues that Türkiye has been facing and seeking a solution for more than a century. There are many economic, political, and ethnic reasons for this problem that are rooted in the Ottoman Empire.1 The Republic of Türkiye was established on the remnants of the non-ethnic empire and was governed by the CHP, which has seen itself as the founder and protector of the state. The CHP ruled the country as a single-party government until May 14, 1950, and aimed to shape the political, social, and cultural identity of the country as a “guiding party” or a “modernist school.”2 Constructing a state centered around a secular Turkish identity, emphasizing the republican discourse rather than democracy, positioning secularism as anti-religion and anti-religious, adopting exclusionary nationalism, and ignoring, or trying to assimilate, different ethnic identities were among the main practices of this period.

Already have an account? Sign In.
Print Subscription
4 Print Issues
Subscribe
Digital Subscription
4 Digital Issues
Subscribe
Premium Subscription
4 Print Issues
4 Digital Issues
Subscribe

Labels »  

We use cookies in a limited and restricted manner for specific purposes. For more details, you can see "our data policy". More...