Insight Turkey
Insight Turkey
Challenging ideas
On Turkish politics and International affairs

Insight Turkey > Commentaries |

The Second Trump Administration and Its Implications to the Global Order

The prospect of a second Trump term has reignited global apprehensions, sparking renewed debates about the future trajectory of U.S. foreign policy and its broader implications for international relations. Would his administration once again pursue the "America First" approach, marked by isolationist tendencies, weakened multilateral frameworks, strained alliances, and often unpredictable policymaking style? Or might it chart a new path, potentially adapting to shifting global realities and responding to mounting challenges with a more measured and conciliatory strategy? This commentary seeks to delve into the heart of these debates by examining three key pillars: Trump’s prior foreign policy decisions and their long-term impacts, his current campaign promises and rhetoric, and the evolving geopolitical challenges that await the U.S. on the world stage. Would a second term amplify the unpredictability of his first, further eroding trust in the U.S. as a global leader, or might it reflect lessons learned, offering a recalibrated strategy aimed at balancing national interests with global responsibilities.

The Second Trump Administration and Its Implications to the Global
 

 

 

 

Introduction

 

When President Trump won the election in 2016, there was a profound sense of shock and a significant degree of uncertainty about his approach to foreign policy. Many speculated that this era could mark a return to the isolationist tendencies that had characterized U.S. foreign policy prior to World War II. For proponents of this view, Trump’s electoral victory symbolized the closing of a decades-long chapter of active global engagement, particularly through alliances and multilateralism.1 During the campaign, Trump signaled not only increasingly isolationist sentiments but also expressed dissatisfaction with the U.S. alliances and partnerships in various parts of the world. His slogan “America First” became emblematic of this perspective, widely interpreted as a call to prioritize domestic interests over international commitments. For many, it suggested a reversion to the “factory settings” of U.S. foreign policy, where unilateralism and national self-interest would take precedence over cooperative frameworks.2

Already have an account? Sign In.
Print Subscription
4 Print Issues
Subscribe
Digital Subscription
4 Digital Issues
Subscribe
Premium Subscription
4 Print Issues
4 Digital Issues
Subscribe

Labels »  

We use cookies in a limited and restricted manner for specific purposes. For more details, you can see "our data policy". More...