Insight Turkey
Insight Turkey
Challenging ideas
On Turkish politics and International affairs

Insight Turkey > Articles |

From Liberal Order to Protectionism: Trump’s Gambit to Refashion America’s Trade Policy

This analysis examines the Trump Administration’s drive to transform U.S. trade policy from multilateral liberalism to aggressive protectionism, the sharpest break with postwar economic orthodoxy in seven decades. Drawing on economic data, opinion research, and policy analysis, it argues that the shift constituted not a tactical adjustment but an ideological reorientation: Trade reconceived as an instrument of national assertion rather than mutual prosperity. Contrary to conventional expectations, the turn was driven by elite strategic calculation rather than popular demand, as American consumers consistently prioritized price over origin and showed little appetite for tariffs. The Trump-Vance coalition weaponized the real grievances of deindustrialization, recasting structural dislocation as moral betrayal requiring punitive remedy. A tariff escalation reaching levels unseen since the 1930s functioned less as an engine of industrial revival than as a symbol of restored sovereignty, its costs accepted as proof of resolve. The contest with China anchors this statecraft and rests on a durable bipartisan consensus. Herein lies the central paradox: the protectionist turn reproduces the elite, state-led character of the liberal order it repudiates, exposing continuity beneath rhetorical rupture.

From Liberal Order to Protectionism Trump s Gambit to Refashion
 

 

Introduction

The Trump Administration has engineered one of the most consequential shifts in U.S. trade policy since World War II. For more than seven decades, Washington has played the role of the global free trade system’s chief architect, championing multilateral institutions such as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and its successor, the World Trade Organization (WTO), while steadily lowering barriers to goods and services as a matter of both economic conviction and geopolitical strategy. The underlying belief was that a rule-bound, liberal trading order would generate prosperity, reinforce alliances, and entrench U.S. leadership in global governance. The historic levels of economic riches and prosperity were supposed to pull millions out of poverty while bringing nations ever closer through friendly trade relations. While this was largely achieved in Europe and elsewhere, China emerged as the greatest benefactor of free trade by building an export-oriented economy. As China and others have increased their share in international trade, the U.S. has become more suspicious of the benefits of the system it built, complaining about free riders and the burdens of global leadership.

The foundations of the international trade system, however, have not led to the political liberalism around the world as was promised by the proponents of free trade. Neither did they ensure American dominance in the long run. Instead, jobs have been shipped abroad, and the socio-economic consequences of deindustrialization in the U.S. have remained unaddressed. As America moved rapidly toward a service economy, much of the manufacturing infrastructure went offshore, leaving millions of blue-collar workers either out of work or out of the labor market. As the 2008 financial crisis showed, the lower middle classes were vulnerable in times of global economic stress, and the federal government had no solutions other than bailing out large corporations in the name of preventing a larger crisis. The “too big to fail” motto deepened the economic disillusionment of the masses, and the promise of the American dream appeared ever more beyond reach for millions. While Wall Street continued to promote U.S.-led economic globalization, it became anathema to the aspirations of the main streets.

Already have an account? Sign In.
Print Subscription
4 Print Issues
Subscribe
Digital Subscription
4 Digital Issues
Subscribe
Premium Subscription
4 Print Issues
4 Digital Issues
Subscribe

Labels »  

We use cookies in a limited and restricted manner for specific purposes. For more details, you can see "our data policy". More...